<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is not only about being Smart: Being Smart is Too Easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneyandinvesting.net/2007/12/13/it-is-not-only-about-being-smart-being-smart-is-too-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneyandinvesting.net/2007/12/13/it-is-not-only-about-being-smart-being-smart-is-too-easy/</link>
	<description>Making you richer every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:16:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyandinvesting.net/2007/12/13/it-is-not-only-about-being-smart-being-smart-is-too-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyandinvesting.net/?p=95#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>This entire article is written with a very nasty and incorrect assumption -- that being *perceived* as &quot;smart&quot; is the same thing as *being* smart and provides the same benefits.  

You say &quot;Being smart can be learned&quot; and then proceed to write about ways to *seem* smart, not be smart.  

I agree that execution is important -- people who *are* smart (not just *appear* smart) will be more likely to execute.  People who are *not* smart may execute, but their execution will not be as worthwhile.  For example, I don&#039;t want someone without a certain level of mathematical intelligence (ie., without &quot;smarts&quot;) piloting a plane (execution of a difficult task that requires this intelligence).

I don&#039;t want someone who is not smart negotiating a business deal on my behalf, either.  Maybe the not-smart person will get it done faster -- but at what expense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entire article is written with a very nasty and incorrect assumption &#8212; that being *perceived* as &#8220;smart&#8221; is the same thing as *being* smart and provides the same benefits.  </p>
<p>You say &#8220;Being smart can be learned&#8221; and then proceed to write about ways to *seem* smart, not be smart.  </p>
<p>I agree that execution is important &#8212; people who *are* smart (not just *appear* smart) will be more likely to execute.  People who are *not* smart may execute, but their execution will not be as worthwhile.  For example, I don&#8217;t want someone without a certain level of mathematical intelligence (ie., without &#8220;smarts&#8221;) piloting a plane (execution of a difficult task that requires this intelligence).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want someone who is not smart negotiating a business deal on my behalf, either.  Maybe the not-smart person will get it done faster &#8212; but at what expense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
